Artificial superintelligence (ASI) can be far different than we can think about.

The biggest difference between artificial general intelligence (AGI) and artificial superintelligence (ASI) is that the ASI is not connected to certain systems as AGI. This means that ASI is like a fog where reality moves. 

"A superintelligence is a hypothetical agent that possesses intelligence surpassing that of the brightest and most gifted human minds. "Superintelligence" may also refer to a property of problem-solving systems (e.g., superintelligent language translators or engineering assistants) whether or not these high-level intellectual competencies are embodied in agents that act in the world. A superintelligence may or may not be created by an intelligence explosion and associated with a technological singularity." (Wikipedia, Superintelligence) 

The artificial superintelligence ASI is the tool that connects people with the brain-computer interface (BSI) with the internet. The internet is like a matrix that allows people to teleport virtually from one place to another. That is like an ultimate virtual reality. 

The route to artificial superintelligence is long and full of surprises. Artificial general intelligence (AGI) is a tool that mimics human intelligence and learning methods. 

That tool will be as intelligent as humans. But it learns faster than humans. 

However, artificial superintelligence (ASI) is the tool that beats humans in intelligence. ASI will be more intelligent than humans are. 

It will be more powerful than humans. The ASI can be the first intelligent creature that we meet. 

But then we must ask how the AI is more intelligent than we are. The AI is a tool that knows many things. It can have the entire library in its memories. 

That makes it possible for the AI to answer every question. That we ask in seconds. 

People with internet connection. Can find answers to the same questions in seconds. So, how can we measure intelligence? Would a thing like a chess game be the thing that measures intelligence? The reality is that computers from the 1990s beat the average chess player in chess. 

If they have a good chess program. And if some chess world champion wins some computer, that doesn't mean that is possible for the average player. 

We must realize this when we talk about ASI. When we think about ASI as scientists we must ask would that thing be intelligent? 

Or will it be less intelligent? If somebody orders it to make some new theories? 

Or we can ask ourselves, would Albert Einstein be less intelligent if somebody had ordered him to make the "Theory of Relativity"? If we think of superiority and the henchman who makes that theory? Einstein or his supervisor? That is an interesting question. 

Artificial superintelligence can communicate with people through robots or brain-computer interfaces, BCI. This means that people can talk with artificial superintelligence using the BCI systems. Or the person who has that system can act as a medium between ASI and humans. Maybe that medium is rather a humanoid robot than a human who carries the BCI. 

The BCI must adapt to the slow data-handling speed of human brains. 

The system must use the system that covers the entire brain shell to exchange information between brains and ASI. 

The speed of thinking is extremely low. But the brains can use millions of axons for data transport. The slow speed in the single wire is not a very bad thing. That allows other neurons to control communication that travels in the axons. 

The brains operate oppositely. Or in a different way than computers. In human brains, data travels in neurotransmitters which means brains mimic the quantum neural system. The neurotransmitters are like qubits that travel in the brain. 

Neurotransmitters keep brain temperature low because information is stored in those chemicals. Lots of low-power data handling units help to keep the temperature low. Fast units require more nutrients and they produce more heat. So, a large number of low-power units will keep the temperature low. 

So neurocomputers might use nanotubes to transport ions that mimic neurotransmitters. 

They can use optical systems where lasers with different colors or wavelengths can transport data in that complex system. 

The neurocomputer is a system that requires lots of processors. 

Billions of neurons are working in human brains. And that creates a very big temperature problem. Same way temperature causes problems in large-scale neurocomputers. 

The brains trust a large number of connections rather than in small number of fast connections. 

In those connections travels smaller data mass, than internal connections in computers.

The data system in human brains is not like a computer. Things like neurotransmitter chemicals are tools. Whose mission is to protect brains.

But in the case of damage or misconnections. The lost data mass is lower than in computer damage. The large number of low-capacity connections allows the brains to keep voltage low in those connections. And if there is damage. That allows other neurons to rescue the information. 

The neuron requires time to load information in chemical neurotransmitters. Artificial brains will require ion cannons between transmitting and receiving routes. Those ions mimic the neurotransmitters. 

Those chemical's mission could be to keep the temperature low. In the human brain. If the brain uses only electricity that causes the high temperature and shortcuts. So brain uses neurotransmitters as qubits and the system in human brain mimics quantum network. 

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Superintelligence

https://aiandthefuture.wordpress.com/2025/01/04/artificial-superintelligence-asi-can-be-far-different-than-we-can-think-about/