Skip to main content

Does the universe have no beginning, as Stephen Hawking thought?



"Timeline of the metric expansion of the universe. Where space, including hypothetical non-observable portions of the universe, is represented at each time by the circular sections. On the left, the dramatic expansion occurs in the inflationary epoch; and at the center, the expansion accelerates (artist's concept; not to scale)". (Wikipedia, Big Bang)


The question is: is there even the beginning point for the universe? Is it possible that there was no beginning for the universe? In this text term "universe" means the bubble of material in space. And space means the dimension where that bubble of material is hovering. The Big Bang is the point of spacetime where the material is released to the universe or space. 

The reason why singularity theory has been dominated the discussions about the beginning of the universe. Is that we haven't believed that light or photons can turn to the material. And when we are talking about antimatter-matter annihilation. We must realize that annihilation happens between all particle-antiparticle pairs. So quark and its anti-quark are also annihilating like other particle and antiparticle pairs. 


Annihilation simply means that the particles are turning to energy. And the ability to form material from light or energy means anti-annihilation. So confirming that thing opens the new paths for the Big Bang theories. 


That thing means we should define the Big Bang to the point, where the material was forming in the universe and the new tests have proven that the material can form straight from the energy. So where that energy came from in the case of the Big Bang? Maybe it came from other universes. And here I mean the universe is like the bubble where all material existed. But the space continues beyond this bubble. 

And that causes the theory that the light quants impacted with photons and formed the electron-positron pairs, that formed annihilation called the Big Bang. So in this version of the Big Bang theories the universe, or the space where entire material that we know existed before the Big Bang. And there was some kind of wave movement that turned to the material. So the Big Bang released material to the space. But it didn't form the space, where the universe is. 


When the light forms material forms the electron-positron pairs that thing causes an interesting idea. Is it possible that when the Big Bang happened that thing formed two universes? 


So if we are thinking that way the original Big Bang happened outside our universe. In that process formed two clouds of particles. The electron clouds where electrons were the majority and that cloud formed our universe. 

And in the Big  Bang also released the positron cloud or the cloud where positrons were the majority and the electrons were the minority. Then the material formed through the annihilation from the electron-positron pairs to higher particles.  And that means that the same reaction should happen in that another universe. 

Those two universes are the universe where we are living and the antimaterial universe. That thing is causing interesting ideas about the things like alien creatures. We have noticed that the particle can turn matter to antimatter and backward. That means there is the possibility to travel between those universes. But the material must turn from material to antimatter. 


()https://www.livescience.com/einstein-equation-matter-from-light


()https://www.quantamagazine.org/physicists-debate-hawkings-idea-that-the-universe-had-no-beginning-20190606/


()https://qsstudy.com/physics/pure-energy-is-transformed-into-matter-antimatter-by-colliding-with-light


()https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Annihilation


()https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Big_Bang


()https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Multiverse


Image:()https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Big_Bang


()https://kimmoswritings.blogspot.com/2021/08/does-universe-have-no-beginning-as.html

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The new bendable sensor is like straight from the SciFi movies.

"Researchers at Osaka University have developed a groundbreaking flexible optical sensor that works even when crumpled. Using carbon nanotube photodetectors and wireless Bluetooth technology, this sensor enables non-invasive analysis and holds promise for advancements in imaging, wearable technology, and soft robotics. Credit: SciTechDaily.com" (ScitechDaily, From Sci-Fi to Reality: Scientists Develop Unbreakable, Bendable Optical Sensor) The new sensor is like the net eye of bugs. But it's more accurate than any natural net eye. The system is based on flexible polymer film and nanotubes. The nanotubes let light travel through it. And then the film at the bottom of those tubes transforms that light into the image. This ultra-accurate CCD camera can see ultimate details in advanced materials. The new system can see the smallest deviation in the materials.  And that thing makes it possible to improve safety on those layers. The ability to see ultra-small differences on surf

Quantum breakthrough: stable quantum entanglement at room temperature.

"Researchers have achieved quantum coherence at room temperature by embedding a light-absorbing chromophore within a metal-organic framework. This breakthrough, facilitating the maintenance of a quantum system’s state without external interference, marks a significant advancement for quantum computing and sensing technologies". (ScitechDaily, Quantum Computing Breakthrough: Stable Qubits at Room Temperature) Japanese researchers created stable quantum entanglement at room temperature. The system used a light-absorbing chromophore along with a metal-organic framework. This thing is a great breakthrough in quantum technology. The room-temperature quantum computers are the new things, that make the next revolution in quantum computing. This technology may come to markets sooner than we even think. The quantum computer is the tool, that requires advanced operating- and support systems.  When the support system sees that the quantum entanglement starts to reach energy stability. I

Humans should be at the center of AI development.

"Experts advocate for human-centered AI, urging the design of technology that supports and enriches human life, rather than forcing humans to adapt to it. A new book featuring fifty experts from over twelve countries and disciplines explores practical ways to implement human-centered AI, addressing risks and proposing solutions across various contexts." (ScitechDaily, 50 Global Experts Warn: We Must Stop Technology-Driven AI) The AI is the ultimate tool for handling things that behave is predictable. Things like planets' orbiting and other mechanical things that follow certain natural laws are easy things for the AI. The AI might feel human, it can have a certain accent. And that thing is not very hard to program.  It just requires the accent wordbook, and then AI can transform grammatically following text into text with a certain accent. Then the AI drives that data to the speech synthesizer. The accent mode follows the same rules as language translation programs. The ac