When we think that machines are not intelligent, we must find something that supports this thesis. The most usual argument is that we are putting limits on those machines. We are regulating the data what the machine gets and how it uses that data. So the machine cannot become more intelligent than we are, because we can stop it if it gets too much data for use. And that thing could be the worst mistake ever made.
The creator of that idea didn't probably know about the internet and autonomous machine learning. Nowadays is possible that some algorithm is searching the data and store it. Without the user don't recognize it. And that thing makes the possibility that the machine knows things that the users and programmers are not stored in that system in purpose.
Can computers be more intelligent than humans? Sometimes people are arguments that the machine cannot be more intelligent than humans by using the argument that humans are created machines, and that's why the machine cannot be more intelligent or smarter than their creators. The case is like can the descendant be more intelligent than their parents.
Sometimes we are asked, "are we intelligent enough to see the intelligence of other species?". We are living in the "sapiens centric world". That means that we are thinking that there cannot be another intelligent species in the world or even the universe. The SETI program and search for extraterrestrial civilizations is accepted as science. Before that those things were just stories.
Does the ability to win humans in chess make AI more intelligent than humans?
The thing is that artificial intelligence is winning humans in chess very easily. The new learning machines that can create new tactics and strategies on the chessboard are invincible. Those systems are calculating every each movement of those buttons very effectively. But those systems are also recording tactics that other players are using. That system makes the database by using the game records, and then it can mix those databases for selecting the most effective movements.
But does that ability make the AI smarter than humans? Are the things like chess the description of intelligence? Or how we are describing the intelligence? The things like making the mathematical or some other formulas or modeling the quantum mechanical rules are sometimes described as "intelligence".
But the people who are working with those kinds of things might not even have a driver's license. That means those people cannot do everything in the world. Even the smartest mind in the world has a limit, is the thing, how we are thinking. Or is there some kind of limit? The theoretical knowledge doesn't necessarily mean. That there is some kind of possibility to make practical solutions to every problem modeled by theorists. And being a good quantum physicist or artificial intelligence researcher doesn't mean that those people are good chess players.
()https://kimmoswritings.blogspot.com/2021/08/are-we-intelligent-enough-to-see.html
Comments
Post a Comment